The question we seek to answer is: in what way do
training can be more or less adapted to the territories? And so
: how do we bridge the gap between existing training spaces
in a territory and the needs of a territory? It is extremely
strategic and very important to have this long-term vision.
Then you have to know who you are doing it with and why you are doing it. Se
projecting allows us to have a reflection as well as an inflection by
in relation to our practices, this is the medium-term vision.
Finally, in the short term: how do we do it?
These 3 levels of questions are asked in the VET 4 Change project and
we seek to answer them for our organizations and on our
territories. The idea is to be able to understand how we are
readjust our training processes and strategic skills
territorial in relation to changes in the environment but
also of the entire territorial system.
The next step will be to support local stakeholders in
think better about their methods and their consequences. In parallel,
we must ask ourselves the following question: “Is the territory
ready to offer the learning conditions that are necessary for
learners? » Indeed, in a few years, things have changed: we
we no longer learn in the same way, we no longer work in the same way.
Learners need the territory to develop their
working and training conditions.
The “ultimate” step will be to find the methods most suited to
the most specific audiences in a territory designed intelligently
collective and move from individual learners to megastructures
learners. Between the two, there is the common, this junction between the
individuals and communities.
_ Giang
